Author:Dave Taylor
If you've been reading weblogs for a while and sporadically following links and blogroll entries to explore new blogs, you've learned one of the dark truths of the blogosphere: most blogs are boring, written by bloggers with passion, but little creative spark and even less writing ability.
This doesn't mean that they shouldn't be blogging - after all, you and I are
going to disagree on which blogs are good and bad anyway - but it does suggest
that sprinkling the blogosphere with some creative ideas and innovative writing
would benefit us all as this communications channel grows and evolves.
Chief among the many methods bloggers are using to explore how blogs can
become more engaging are so-called "fake blogs" or "fictitious blogs", and
that's what I'm going to talk about in this article, and show how they could be
a great addition to the blogosphere, not a plague to be eradicated.
Purists immediately bridle at what I'm saying, I know, because for many
people the cornerstones of a good weblog are credibility and authenticity, both
of which are rather hard to establish if you're pretending to be a moose,
rabbit, cartoon character or comic book superhero in your weblog!
Cast our net more widely and it's clear that storytelling has been an
essential part of marketing and public relations for eons, from court jesters
and actors to witch doctors and snake oil salesmen, to today's mock reality
shows. Ask any good storyteller whether they get into character when telling a
story and they'll all say "you bet I do" because pretending to be someone
directly associated with the story makes the tale more compelling, exciting and
engaging.
Weblogs can and should enjoy the same benefits. There's no reason why a fake
blog cannot be interesting, amusing and informative, while also having the
desirous blog characteristics of credibility and authenticity within the context
of the blog itself. Indeed, I don't even like the pejorative "fake blog", so
let's call it a "story blog instead, to emphasize that everything about the
weblog, from its premise and entries to the very persona of the author, are part
of the fiction, of the story being told.
Given that this isn't really such a radical idea after all, why is it that
there are so many terrible story blogs released, from the daft McDonald's
Lincoln Fry blog
to the worthwhile but overly flashy
Captain Morgan
Rum blog or, the worst I've seen to date, Wrigley's
Juicy Fruit Gum Blog?
I think that the real reason that story blogs aren't better and therefore
more popular is because it's just darn hard to produce material week after
week as a fictitious character. Now I think we're getting to the root of
the problem. I really believe that story blogs are indeed an interesting new
marketing channel, but they're still much more likely to be terrible
abominations than anything cool or interesting.
Persistence is a tough obstacle: a weblog with a half-dozen entries that's
then ignored certainly won't produce any useful results, but let's consider
pseudonyms or pen names in literature as an interesting comparison. It might be
difficult to write under an assumed name, particularly if the name suggests a
different gender or ethnicity, but writing a novel is still a finite project and
when the manuscript is done, the character invented can be put back on the
shelf. Actors do this every day too, actually. They call it "method acting",
when they become the character they're portraying.
What if you can create a logical reason that the blog should have a finite
lifespan, though? One of the great hurdles of story blogs can then neatly be
overcome.
Two examples of how this might work: "JayBlob for Olympics mascot!" which
runs until the mascot is announced. Or, much better, "Going to Harvard, come
heck or high water" which goes through all the challenges of taking college
entrance exams, visiting colleges,
exploring Harvard, quoting news stories, good and bad, about Harvard, and ends
one day with "The letter arrived, and… I'm in!! Oh, happy day!!! I'm done
blogging, but I sure hope to see you on campus one day too!"
I realize some bloggers are immediately turned off by both of these examples,
and indeed by the very suggestion of legitimacy that I invite by calling these
"story blogs", not "fake blogs", "faux blogs", or any of the other frankly
insulting terms that people use. But they're mistaking their use of the
medium for the medium itself.
Blogs, by themselves, have no constraints or requirements. They're just
communications tools waiting to be sculpted into something useful, interesting
or entertaining. And in that vein, I continue to look forward to the day when
creative writers really have that moment of inspiration and start to show how
story blogs can become some of the best and most engaging content in the
blogosphere.
And did I mention that I'm actually a committee of people writing under a
pseudonym? No? Well what if I were? Would you value this article and my blogs
any less?
About the author
Dave Taylor has been involved with the Internet since 1980
and is widely recognized as an expert on both technical and business issues. He
has been published over a thousand times, launched four Internet-related startup
companies, has written nineteen business and technical books and holds both an
MBA and MS Ed. Dave maintains three weblogs,
The Intuitive Life
Business Blog, focused on business and industry analysis, the eponymously
named Ask Dave Taylor
devoted to tech and business Q&A and The
Attachment Parenting Blog,
discussing topics of interest to parents. Dave is a top-rated speaker, sought
after conference and workshop facilitator and frequent
Article Source:
http://www.bloggertalk.net